Disinformation: The use of false information [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 14 (2):231-240 (2004)
The distinction between misinformation and disinformation becomes especially important in political, editorial, and advertising contexts, where sources may make deliberate efforts to mislead, deceive, or confuse an audience in order to promote their personal, religious, or ideological objectives. The difference consists in having an agenda. It thus bears comparison with lying, because lies are assertions that are false, that are known to be false, and that are asserted with the intention to mislead, deceive, or confuse. One context in which disinformation abounds is the study of the death of JFK, which I know from more than a decade of personal research experience. Here I reflect on that experience and advance a preliminary theory of disinformation that is intended to stimulate thinking on this increasingly important subject. Five kinds of disinformation are distinguished and exemplified by real life cases I have encountered. It follows that the story you are about to read is true.
|Keywords||Assassination Science Murder in Dealey Plaza The Warren Report JFK assassination disinformation fabricated evidence misinformation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Edward H. Spence (2009). A Universal Model for the Normative Evaluation of Internet Information. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):243-253.
Patrick Allo (2010). A Classical Prejudice? Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (1-2):25-40.
Patrick Allo (2010). A Classical Prejudice? Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (1-2):25-40.
Similar books and articles
Patricia Barres & P. N. Johnson-Laird (2003). On Imagining What is True (and What is False). Thinking and Reasoning 9 (1):1 – 42.
J. Michael Dunn (2010). Contradictory Information: Too Much of a Good Thing. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):425 - 452.
Don Fallis (2010). Lying and Deception. Philosophers' Imprint 10 (11).
Andreas Stokke (2013). Lying and Asserting. Journal of Philosophy 110 (1):33-60.
Alexander Rosenberg (1986). Ignorance and Disinformation in the Philosophy of Biology: A Reply to STENT. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 1 (4):461-471.
Don Fallis (2009). What Is Lying? Journal of Philosophy 106 (1):29-56.
Albert Szymanski (1981). On the Uses of Disinformation to Legitimize the Revival of the Cold War: Health in the U.S.S.R. Science and Society 45 (4):453 - 474.
Steven Kates (1998). A Qualitative Exploration Into Voters' Ethical Perceptions of Political Advertising: Discourse, Disinformation, and Moral Boundaries. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (16):1871-1885.
James H. Fetzer (2004). Information: Does It Have to Be True? [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 14 (2):223-229.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #88,989 of 1,793,171 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,495 of 1,793,171 )
How can I increase my downloads?