Recollection and phantasy: The problem of the truth of memory in Husserl's phenomenology [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (4):727-746 (2013)
|Abstract||The epistemological problem of the truth of memory cannot be resolved without establishing a clear distinction between recollection and phantasy. Husserl’s position in this regard is both paradoxical and compelling. It is paradoxical because Husserl repeats his antiskeptical intention many times; but nevertheless in his phenomenology, recollection and phantasy are almost completely identical. Perhaps no philosopher has so radically approached the experience of remembering and the experience of fantasizing as Husserl. But at the same time, the recognition of this fundamental similarity is precisely what allows the phenomenologist to avoid empiricist misunderstandings and thus approach the problem of the distinction between recollection and phantasy in a much more persuasive way than the traditional one. In this paper, I will first try to show how and why Husserl approaches recollection and phantasy. Then I will try to show how it is possible to establish a clear distinction between these two phenomena without misunderstanding the possibility of false memory|
|Keywords||Memory Phenomenology Husserl Phantasy Recollection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Javier Enrique Carreño Cobos (2013). The Many Senses of Imagination and the Manifestation of Fiction: A View From Husserl's Phenomenology of Phantasy. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 29 (2):143-162.
Julia Jansen (2005). On the Development of Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenology of Imagination and its Use for Interdisciplinary Research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (2):121-132.
Eduard Marbach (2012). Edmund Husserl: Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898–1925). [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 28 (3):225-237.
William R. McKenna, Robert M. Harlan & Laurence E. Winters (eds.) (1981). Apriori and World: European Contributions to Husserlian Phenomenology. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.
Richard M. Zaner (1973). Examples and Possibles: A Criticism of Husserl's Theory of Free-Phantasy Variation. Research in Phenomenology 3 (1):29-43.
Dorion Cairns, Fred Kersten & Richard M. Zaner (eds.) (1973). Phenomenology: Continuation and Criticism. The Hague,M. Nijhoff.
Paul Ricœur (1967/2007). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Rudolf Bernet (2002). Unconscious Consciousness in Husserl and Freud. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (3):327-351.
Ion Tănăsescu (2010). Le Concept Psychologique de la Représentation de la Fantaisie Chez Brentano Et Sa Réception Chez Husserl. Studia Phaenomenologica 10:45-75.
Edmund Husserl & Marvin Farber (eds.) (1940/1968). Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl. New York, Greenwood Press.
Stan Klein (2013). Making the Case That Episodic Recollection is Attributable to Operations Occurring at Retrieval Rather Than to Content Stored in a Dedicated Subsystem of Long-Term Memory. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 7 (3):1-14.
Robert Sokolowski (2008). Husserl's Discovery of Philosophical Discourse. Husserl Studies 24 (3):167-175.
Nam-In Lee (2000). Practical Intentionality and Transcendental Phenomenology as a Practical Philosophy. Husserl Studies 17 (1):49-63.
Joseph Cohen (2012). Levinas and the Problem of Phenomenology. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (3):363-374.
Added to index2012-09-20
Total downloads3 ( #215,006 of 757,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 757,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?