David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 10 (1-4):298 – 312 (1967)
It is the thesis of the paper that the arts of the twentieth century have gone much further in the criticism of customary modes of thought than have both the sciences and the various critical philosophies which exist today. Moreover, they have not only developed an abstract principle of criticism, they have also studied the psychological conditions under which criticism can be expected to become effective. Some plays and the theoretical essays of Ionesco are analysed as an example. It is pointed out that Ionesco resembles Bacon in that he believes in an unchangeable basis of humanity from which all ideologies proceed. An attempt is made to free Ionesco from these dogmatic elements, theoretically, as well as practically (i.e. as regards the performance of his plays) and to utilize to the full his contributions to a theatre that is free of prejudice, and fully critical
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Ian James Kidd (2011). Objectivity, Abstraction, and the Individual: The Influence of Søren Kierkegaard on Paul Feyerabend. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):125-134.
Matteo Collodel (forthcoming). Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological Issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
J. Curthoys & W. Suchting (1977). Feyerabend's Discourse Against Method: A Marxist Critique. Inquiry 20 (1-4):243 – 371.
John Richards & Ernst von Glasersfeld (1979). The Control of Perception and the Construction of Reality. Dialectica 33 (1):37-58.
Spyridon George Couvalis (1986). Should Philosophers Become Playwrights? Inquiry 29 (1-4):451-457.
Similar books and articles
J. T. S. (1942). Theatre in the War. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 2 (5).
S. T. (1942). Theatre in the War. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 2 (5).
Luke Ferretter (2006). Louis Althusser. Routledge.
Martin Leet (2002). Aftereffects of Knowledge: Dogmatic Retreats and Sceptical Adventures. Critical Horizons 3 (2):201-223.
Sally J. Scholz (2001). Resurrecting Language Through Social Criticism. Social Philosophy Today 17:203-216.
George Beiswanger (1944). Theatre Today: Symptoms and Surmises. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 3 (9/10):19-29.
L. A. C. Dobrez (1986). The Existential and its Exits: Literary and Philosophical Perspectives on the Works of Beckett, Ionesco, Genet, & Pinter. St. Martin's Press.
Steve Waters (2011). Political Playwriting: The Art of Thinking in Public. Topoi 30 (2):137-144.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads25 ( #147,839 of 1,790,533 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #270,682 of 1,790,533 )
How can I increase my downloads?