Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):685-700 (2006)
|Abstract||Given the close relationship between the modern arms industry and the military, engineers and other professionals who work in the arms industry should be held accountable to the principles of just war theory. While they do not deploy weapons on the battlefield and are not in the military chain of command, technical professionals nonetheless have a moral duty to abide by principles of jus ad bellum and jus in bello. They are morally responsible both for choosing the companies that employ them (and to whom these companies sell arms) and a well as what types of arms they develop.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita & David Lalman (1988). Arms Races and the Opportunity for Peace. Synthese 76 (2):263-283.
Malham M. Wakin, Kenneth H. Wenker & James Kempf (eds.) (1987). Military Ethics: Reflections on Principles--The Profession of Arms, Military Leadership, Ethical Practices, War and Morality, Educating the Citizen-Soldier. National Defense University Press.
Robert Sparrow (2009). Predators or Ploughshares? Arms Control of Robotic Weapons. IEEE Technology and Society 28 (1):25-29.
Brian Orend (2004). Kant's Ethics of War and Peace. Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177.
Marcus Hedahl (2009). Blood and Blackwaters: A Call to Arms for the Profession of Arms. Journal of Military Ethics 8 (1):19-33.
Jeff McMahan (2004). The Ethics of Killing in War. Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Edmund F. Byrne (2007). Assessing Arms Makers' Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3):201 - 217.
Edmund F. Byrne (2007). Can Arms Be Sold Responsibly in the Global Market? Social Philosophy Today 23:103-114.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #17,333 of 722,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,774 )
How can I increase my downloads?