David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 15 (2):171-180 (1993)
According to the theory of ecocentric morality, the environment and its many ecosystems are entitled to a direct moral standing, and not simply a standing derivative from human interests. J. Baird Callicott has offered two possible metaphysical foundations for ecocentrism that attempt to show that inherent goodness can apply to environmental collections and not just to individual agents. I argue that Callicott’s first theory fails because it relies on a problematic theory of moral sentiments and that his second theory fails because it rests on an unsupported parallel between the breakdown of the subject-object dichotomy suggested by quantum theory and an alleged actualization of morality upon the interaction of environmental collections with consciousness. Finally, I argue that Callicott overrates the need for a metaphysical grounding of inherent value, and that the metaphysical question has little bearing on the normative issue of ecocentrism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. Baird Callicott (1993). On Warren and Cheney's Critique of Callicott's Ecological Metaphysics. Environmental Ethics 15 (4):373-374.
John Hadley (2007). Critique of Callicott's Biosocial Moral Theory. Ethics and the Environment 12 (1):67-78.
Jim Cheney (1991). Callicott's “Metaphysics of Morals”. Environmental Ethics 13 (4):311-325.
J. Baird Callicott (1985). Intrinsic Value, Quantum Theory, and Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 7 (3):257-275.
Eric B. Horn (2005). On Callicott's Second-Order Principles. Environmental Ethics 27 (4):411-428.
Andrew Light (1996). Callicott and Naess on Pluralism. Inquiry 39 (2):273 – 294.
Bryan G. Norton (1995). Why I Am Not a Nonanthropocentrist: Callicott and the Failure of Monistic Inherentism. Environmental Ethics 17 (4):341-358.
Ernest Partridge (1996). Ecological Morality and Nonmoral Sentiments. Environmental Ethics 18 (2):149-163.
Darren Domsky (2006). The Inadequacy of Callicott's Ecological Communitarianism. Environmental Ethics 28 (4):395-412.
Karen J. Warren & Jim Cheney (1993). Ecosystem Ecology and Metaphysical Ecology: A Case Study. Environmental Ethics 15 (2):99-116.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #238,008 of 1,938,811 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #100,512 of 1,938,811 )
How can I increase my downloads?