Maudlin's truth and paradox [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):713–720 (2006)
Tim Maudlin’s Truth and Paradox is terrific. In some sense its solution to the paradoxes is familiar—the book advocates an extension of what’s called the Kripke-Feferman theory (although the definition of validity it employs disguises this fact). Nonetheless, the perspective it casts on that solution is completely novel, and Maudlin uses this perspective to try to make the prima facie unattractive features of this solution seem palatable, indeed inescapable. Moreover, the book deals with many important issues that most writers on the paradoxes never deal with, including issues about the application of the Gödel theorems to powerful theories that include our theory of truth. The book includes intriguing excursions into general metaphysics, e.g. on the nature of logic, facts, vagueness, and much more; and it’s lucid and lively, a pleasure to read. It will interest a wide range of philosophers.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
W. V. Quine (1986). Philosophy of Logic. Harvard University Press.
Saul A. Kripke (1975). Outline of a Theory of Truth. Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
Scott Soames (1999). Understanding Truth. Oxford University Press.
Anil Gupta (1982). Truth and Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1):1-60.
Citations of this work BETA
Miroslav Hanke (2014). Semantic Paradox: A Comparative Analysis of Scholastic and Analytic Views. Res Philosophica 91 (3):367-386.
Similar books and articles
Jon Barwise (1987). The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity. Oxford University Press.
Hartry Field (2003). A Revenge-Immune Solution to the Semantic Paradoxes. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (2):139-177.
Tim Maudlin (2006). Précis of Truth and Paradox. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):696-704.
Tim Maudlin (2006). Précis of Truth and Paradox. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):696–704.
Keith Simmons (1993). Universality and the Liar: An Essay on Truth and the Diagonal Argument. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen Read (2010). Field's Paradox and Its Medieval Solution. History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (2):161-176.
Kevin Scharp (2010). Truth's Saviour? [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):183 - 188.
Nuel Belnap (2006). Presentence, Revision, Truth, and Paradox. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):705–712.
Tim Maudlin (2004). Truth and Paradox: Solving the Riddles. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #80,991 of 1,796,423 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #136,212 of 1,796,423 )
How can I increase my downloads?