Physicians and strikes: Can a walkout over the malpractice crisis be ethically justified?
American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):12 – 16 (2004)
| Abstract | Malpractice insurance rates have created a crisis in American medicine. Rates are rising and reimbursements are not keeping pace. In response, physicians in the states hardest hit by this crisis are feeling compelled to take political action, and the current action of choice seems to be physician strikes. While the malpractice insurance crisis is acknowledged to be severe, does it justify the extreme action of a physician walkout? Should physicians engage in this type of collective action, and what are the costs to patients and the profession when such action is taken? I will offer three related arguments against physician strikes that constitute a prima facie prohibition against such action: first, strikes are intended to cause harm to patients; second, strikes are an affront to the physician-patient relationship; and, third, strikes risk decreasing the public's respect for the medical profession. As with any prima facie obligation, there are justifying conditions that may override the moral prohibition, but I will argue that the current malpractice crisis does not rise to the level of such a justifying condition. While the malpractice crisis demands and justifies a political response on the part of the nation's physicians, strikes and slow-downs are not an ethically justified means to the legitimate end of controlling insurance costs. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAllen Kachalia, Niteesh K. Choudhry & David M. Studdert (2005). Physician Responses to the Malpractice Crisis: From Defense to Offense. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (3):416-428.
Kenneth De Ville (1998). Act First and Look Up the Law Afterward?: Medical Malpractice and the Ethics of Defensive Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (6).
Michael J. Saks (1986). Legal Views of the Malpractice Crisis. In Search of the "Lawsuit Crisis". Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 14 (2):77-80.
Carl H. Coleman (2009). Do Physicians' Legal Duties to Patients Conflict with Public Health Values? The Case of Antibiotic Overprescription. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2).
Herman Nys & Paul Schotsmans (2000). Professional Autonomy in Belgium. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (5).
David W. Sumner (1986). Malpractice Crisis or Communication Crisis? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 14 (3-4):205-205.
David N. Hoffman (2005). The Medical Malpractice Insurance Crisis, Again. Hastings Center Report 35 (2):15-19.
Susan Dorr Goold (2000). Collective Action by Physicians: Beyond Strikes. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (4):498-503.
Bjørn Hofmann, Anne Myhr & Søren Holm (2013). Scientific Dishonesty—a Nationwide Survey of Doctoral Students in Norway. BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):1-9.
Alessia T. Bell (2000). Criminal Law/Medical Malpractice: Court Strikes Down Murder Conviction of Physician Where Inappropriate Care Led to Patient's Death. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (2):194-195.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #93,239 of 548,972 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,972 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
