Quine and the correspondence theory
Philosophical Review 83 (2):200-228 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. M. Katz (1990). The Domino Theory. Philosophical Studies 58 (1-2):3-39.
Marian David (2004). Don't Forget About the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):42 – 47.
Marian David (2004). Don't Forget About the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):42 – 47.
Marian David (2004). Don't Forget About the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):42 – 47.
Schick (1985). In Defense of the Correspondence Theory. Philosophy Research Archives 11:319-334.
Russell Marcus (forthcoming). Intrinsic Explanation and Field's Dispensabilist Strategy. International Journal of Philosophical Studies.
Folke Tersman (2008). Quine on Ethics. Theoria 64 (1):84-98.
D. Patterson (2003). What is a Correspondence Theory of Truth? Synthese 137 (3):421 - 444.
Marian David (1994). Correspondence and Disquotation: An Essay on the Nature of Truth. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads74 ( #11,433 of 556,807 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #27,255 of 556,807 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
