Questioning nature: Irigaray, Heidegger and the potentiality of matter
Continental Philosophy Review 36 (1):1-26 (2003)
| Abstract | Irigaray's insistence on sexual difference as the primary difference arises out of a phenomenological perception of nature. Drawing on Heidegger's insights into physis, she begins with his critique of the nature/culture binary. Both philosophers maintain that nature is not matter to be ordered by technical know-how; yet Irigaray reveals that although Heidegger distinguishes physis from techn in his work, his forgetting of the potentiality of matter, the maternal-feminine, and the two-fold essence of being as sexual difference means that his own concept of physis can be understood as another techn. Focussing in particular upon Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotle's privileging of morphé over hylé as a description of presencing into appearance, I show that for Irigaray the movements of presencing and absencing emerge out of a metaphysics that does not take into account the fluidity, the mixtures and interpenetrations of a nature that is limited by fecundity not by death. Our oblivion to nature is the greatest danger, and thus attending to our embodied and hence sexuate nature holds the promise of a new age, since it is rooted in the possibilities of the flesh revealed through the cultivated perception of sexual difference. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAnne van Leeuwen (2010). Sexuate Difference, Ontological Difference: Between Irigaray and Heidegger. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):111-126.
Anne Caldwell (2002). Transforming Sacrifice: Irigaray and the Politics of Sexual Difference. Hypatia 17 (4):16-39.
Alison Stone (2003). The Sex of Nature: A Reinterpretation of Irigaray's Metaphysics and Political Thought. Hypatia 18 (3):60-84.
Anne Leeuwen (2011). An Examination of Irigaray's Commitment to Transcendental Phenomenology in The Forgetting of Air and The Way of Love. Hypatia 28 (2).
William Robert (2010). Antigone's Nature. Hypatia 25 (2):412-436.
Alison Stone (2006). Luce Irigaray and the Philosophy of Sexual Difference. Cambridge University Press.
Krzysztof Ziarek (2000). Proximities: Irigaray and Heidegger on Difference. Continental Philosophy Review 33 (2):133-158.
Alison Stone (2003). Irigaray and Hölderlin on the Relation Between Nature and Culture. Continental Philosophy Review 36 (4):415-432.
Luce Irigaray (1999). The Forgetting of Air in Martin Heidegger. University of Texas Press.
Kate Ince (1996). Questions to Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 11 (2):122 - 140.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads45 ( #24,498 of 549,037 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,706 of 549,037 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
