Theory change and the indeterminacy of reference
Journal of Philosophy 70 (14):462-481 (1973)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Natural Kinds | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDaniel P. Sulmasy (2005). “Diseases and Natural Kinds”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (6):487-513.
Eric H. Gampel (1997). Ethics, Reference, and Natural Kinds. Philosophical Papers 26 (2):147-63.
Thomas Reydon (2009). How to Fix Kind Membership: A Problem for Hpc Theory and a Solution. Philosophy of Science 76 (5).
Chenyang Li (1993). Natural Kinds: Direct Reference, Realism, and the Impossibility of Necessary a Posteriori Truth. Review of Metaphysics 47 (2):261-76.
John S. Wilkins (forthcoming). Biological Essentialism and the Tidal Change of Natural Kinds. Science and Education.
Arthur Fine (1975). How to Compare Theories: Reference and Change. Noûs 9 (1):17-32.
Thomas A. C. Reydon (2009). Do the Life Sciences Need Natural Kinds? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):167-190.
Robert A. Wilson (2004). Review of Laporte on Natural Kinds. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 24:423-426.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads77 ( #10,351 of 549,037 )Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,289 of 549,037 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
