David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Research in Phenomenology 39 (3):333-343 (2009)
This paper is an attempt to solve a key problem of phenomenology. The problem is given with the double role of the revealing capacity for which phenomena are present. On the one hand, this capacity must be prior to all phenomena, because it allows phenomena to show themselves and thus to be what they essentially are. On the other hand, the revealing capacity must be situated in the midst of phenomena; it must belong to the phenomenal world in order to have access to it. This problem has been discussed in different versions by Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty, but in every version it remains aporetic. The problem can be solved by conceiving the capacity, which reveals phenomena, as spatial. The paper shows how the essential priority of the revealing capacity as well as its situatedness in the midst of phenomena has spatial character. Phenomenology thus is spatial thinking
|Keywords||TIME SPACE FREEDOM LANGUAGE PHENOMENOLOGY DASEIN PURE EGO|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roderick M. Chisholm (1993). Spatial Continuity and the Theory of Part and Whole: A Brentano Study. Brentano Studien 4:11-24.
Nora S. Newcombe (2001). A Spatial Coding Analysis of the a-Not-B Error: What IS “Location at A”? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):57-58.
Andrea Sauchelli (2012). On Architecture as a Spatial Art. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 23 (43):53-64.
Leonid Tchertov (2002). Spatial Semiosis in Culture. Sign Systems Studies 30 (2):441-453.
Noa Latham (2002). Spatiotemporal and Spatial Particulars. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):17-35.
Leonid Tchertov (2005). Spatial Semiosis and Time. Sign Systems Studies 33 (2):297-314.
Christopher J. S. Clarke (1995). The Nonlocality of Mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3):231-40.
Glenn Gunzelmann (2011). Introduction to the Topic on Modeling Spatial Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (4):628-631.
L. C. Robertson (1999). What Can Spatial Deficits Teach Us About Feature Binding and Spatial Maps? Visual Cognition 6 (3):409-30.
Pierre Grenon & Barry Smith (2004). SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation 4 (1):69–103.
John Campbell (1993). The Role of Physical Objects in Spatial Thinking. In Naomi M. Eilan, R. McCarthy & M. W. Brewer (eds.), Problems in the Philosophy and Psychology of Spatial Representation. Blackwell
Barbara Tversky (2005). How to Get Around by Mind and Body : Spatial Thought, Spatial Action. In António Zilhão (ed.), Evolution, Rationality, and Cognition: A Cognitive Science for the Twenty-First Century. Routledge
Gottfried Vosgerau (2007). Conceptuality in Spatial Representations. Philosophical Psychology 20 (3):349 – 365.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads20 ( #194,544 of 1,911,732 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #70,397 of 1,911,732 )
How can I increase my downloads?