Religious Studies 42 (1):45-61 (2006)
|Abstract||I attempt to show that a cosmic theistic scheme that includes multiple lives as part of a benign plan for the world is likely to be the most moral scheme. It has the best chance of dealing with key aspects of the problem of evil, or of apparent cosmic injustice – particularly when compared to a single-life scheme. Its advantages have to do with the initial disparate condition of children, and with the massive nature of undeserved harm. A multiple-lives scheme is also promising for handling broader meaning of life questions. I end by replying to some common objections to multiple-lives schemes.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
R. G. Frey (1997). Moral Community and Animal Research in Medicine. Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):123 – 136.
Eddie Hyland (1979). Towards a Radical Critique of Morality and Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 8 (3):156-167.
Chengping Zhang (2010). Moral Luck in Thomas Hardy's Fiction. Philosophy and Literature 34 (1):pp. 82-94.
Gary Kitchen (1997). Alasdair Macintyre: The Epitaph of Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):71-98.
́ Robert N. Kotze (1949). The Scheme of Things. Andrew Dakers.
John Kekes (2010). The Human Condition. Oxford University Press.
John Broome (2009). Motivation. Theoria 75 (2):79-99.
Steven D. Hales (2001). Reincarnation Redux. Philosophia 28 (1-4):359-367.
Carlo Filice (1992). Pacifism. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:493-495.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads80 ( #11,966 of 722,859 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,859 )
How can I increase my downloads?