A difficulty for the possible worlds analysis of counterfactuals

Synthese 189 (1):29-57 (2012)
Abstract
I present a puzzle concerning counterfactual reasoning and argue that it should be solved by giving up the principle of substitution for logical equivalents
Keywords Counterfactuals  Possible worlds  Similarity  Substitution  Intensionality
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,788
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Kit Fine (1975). Critical Notice. Mind 84 (335):451 - 458.
Kit Fine (2012). Counterfactuals Without Possible Worlds. Journal of Philosophy 109 (3):221-246.

View all 13 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Kit Fine (2012). Counterfactuals Without Possible Worlds. Journal of Philosophy 109 (3):221-246.
Barak Krakauer (2012). Counterpossibles. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts
Michael McDermott (2003). Closeness of Worlds. Acta Analytica 18 (1-2):227-230.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-03-30

Total downloads

179 ( #3,385 of 1,099,048 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

21 ( #6,660 of 1,099,048 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.