David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 44 (2):171 – 200 (2001)
Adorno's conception of conceptually articulated experience can be defended and made fruitful for a critical philosophy after the so-called linguistic turn. The aim is both to answer the criticisms raised by Jürgen Habermas and others that Adorno's philosophy remains bound by the premises of a subject-centred philosophy, and to criticize social-pragmatism from the vantage-point of Adorno's philosophy of language. It is shown that Adorno is committed to a picture of experience very much in line with the recent views of John McDowell, which extends the space of reasons beyond the space of concepts. Further, it is shown that non-inferential justification can be combined with an expressivist picture of judgment. Finally, it is argued that what is called the extended space of reasons is ultimately social; that representation, the aboutness of thought, serves expressive roles in a socially articulated space of reason-giving. The advantage of Adorno's position vis-à-vis a one-sided social-pragmatism consists in his defence of what is called subjective-material proprieties of judgment. Adorno's idea that the extended space of reasons implies the acknowledgement of what he refers to as the non-identical within conceptually articulated experience is thus reconstructed and defended. Such non-identity, it is claimed, is exhibited in successful art-works which thereby ought to be counted as forms of reasoning. On this basis, Adorno's philosophy acquires critical and normative significance after the linguistic turn.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A. J. Douglas (2010). Democratic Darkness and Adorno's Redemptive Criticism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (7):819-836.
Roger Foster (2007). Adorno and Heidegger on Language and the Inexpressible. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (2):187-204.
Roger Foster (2007). Adorno and Proust on the Recovery of Experience. Critical Horizons 8 (2):169-185.
Brian O'Connor (2004). Adorno and the Problem of Givenness. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 1:85-99.
Deborah Cook (2001). Adorno, Ideology and Ideology Critique. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (1):1-20.
Lambert Zuidervaart (2007). Social Philosophy After Adorno. Cambridge University Press.
Babette Babich (2011). Adorno on Nihilism and Modern Science, Animals, and Jews. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 15 (1):110-145.
Bed P. Paudyal (2009). Mimesis in Adorno's Aesthetic Theory. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (8):1-10.
Timo Jütten (2012). Adorno on Kant, Freedom and Determinism. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):548-574.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #44,668 of 1,100,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #289,271 of 1,100,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?