David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:535 - 562 (1980)
Two principles of locality used in discussions about quantum mechanics are distinguished. The intuitive no-action-at-a distance requirement is called physical locality. There is also a mathematical requirement of a kind of factorizability which is referred to as "locality". It is argued in this paper that factorizability is not necessary for physical locality. Ways of producing models that are physically local although not factorizable which are concerned with correlations between the behavior of pairs of particles are suggested. These models can account for all the quantum mechanical single and joint probabilities.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Don Howard (1985). Einstein on Locality and Separability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 16 (3):171-201.
Joseph Berkovitz (2008). On Predictions in Retro-Causal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (4):709-735.
Tomasz Bigaj (2010). How to (Properly) Strengthen Bell's Theorem Using Counterfactuals. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (1):58-66.
Arthur Fine (1984). What is Einstein's Statistical Interpretation, or, is It Einstein for Whom Bell's Theorem Tolls? Topoi 3 (1):23-36.
Allen Stairs (2011). A Loose and Separate Certainty: Caves, Fuchs and Schack on Quantum Probability One. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 42 (3):158-166.
Similar books and articles
Arthur Fine (1982). Some Local Models for Correlation Experiments. Synthese 50 (2):279 - 294.
W. Michael Dickson (1996). Determinism and Locality in Quantum Systems. Synthese 107 (1):55 - 82.
Samson Abramsky (2013). Relational Hidden Variables and Non-Locality. Studia Logica 101 (2):411-452.
Sascha Vongehr, Many Worlds Model Resolving the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox Via a Direct Realism to Modal Realism Transition That Preserves Einstein Locality.
Jeremy Butterfield (2001). Book Review:Quantum Chance and Non-Locality: Probablity and Non-Locality in the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics W. Michael Dickson. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 68 (2):263-.
Thomas Filk (2013). Temporal Non-Locality. Foundations of Physics 43 (4):533-547.
J. Berkovitz (1998). Aspects of Quantum Non-Locality I: Superluminal Signalling, Action-at-a-Distance, Non-Separability and Holism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 29 (2):183-222.
William Michael Dickson (1998). Quantum Chance and Non-Locality: Probability and Non-Locality in the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
Jeremy Butterfield (1992). Bell's Theorem: What It Takes. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):41-83.
Eric Winsberg (2003). Quantum Life: Interaction, Entanglement, and Separation. Journal of Philosophy 100 (2):80 - 97.
Eftichios Bitsakis (2002). Forms of Physical Determination. Science and Society 66 (2):228 - 255.
Lauri Hella, Leonid Libkin & Juha Nurmonen (1999). Notions of Locality and Their Logical Characterizations Over Finite Models. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1751-1773.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads8 ( #172,718 of 1,102,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,639 of 1,102,856 )
How can I increase my downloads?