Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Perspectives 8:1-16 (1994)
|Abstract||It is my aim in this paper to show that the contemporary assimilation of essence to modality is fundamentally misguided and that, as a consequence, the corresponding conception of metaphysics should be given up. It is not my view that the modal account fails to capture anything which might reasonably be called a concept of essence. My point, rather, is that the notion of essence which is of central importance to the metaphysics of identity is not to be understood in modal terms or even to be regarded as extensionally equivalent to a modal notion. The one notion is, if I am right, a highly refined version of the other; it is like a sieve which performs a similar function but with a much finer mesh.|
|Keywords||essence modality necessity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Graeme Forbes (1985). The Metaphysics of Modality. Clarendon Press.
Kit Fine (2005). Modality and Tense. Oxford University Press.
Alvin Plantinga (1992). The Nature of Necessity. Clarendon Press.
Edward N. Zalta (2006). Essence and Modality. Mind 115 (459):659-693.
Fabrice Correia (2006). Generic Essence, Objectual Essence, and Modality. Noûs 40 (4):753–767.
Hugh S. Chandler (1986). Sources of Essence. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11 (1):379-389.
Anand Jayprakash Vaidya (2010). Understanding and Essence. Philosophia 38 (4):811-833.
Fabrice Correia (2012). On the Reduction of Necessity to Essence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):639-653.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads625 ( #78 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)55 ( #971 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?