Epistemic instrumentalism, exceeding our grasp [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 137 (1):135 - 139 (2008)
In the concluding chapter of Exceeding our Grasp Kyle Stanford outlines a positive response to the central issue raised brilliantly by his book, the problem of unconceived alternatives. This response, called "epistemic instrumentalism", relies on a distinction between instrumental and literal belief. We examine this distinction and with it the viability of Stanford's instrumentalism, which may well be another case of exceeding our grasp.
Keywords Antirealism  Eliminative inference  Instrumentalism  Pessimistic induction  Realism
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,570
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Michael Devitt (2011). Are Unconceived Alternatives a Problem for Scientific Realism? Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):285-293.
P. Iyer (2004). Liability in the Care of the Elderly. Review of Metaphysics 33 (1):124-131.
Patrick Forber (2008). Forever Beyond Our Grasp? Biology and Philosophy 23 (1):135-141.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

155 ( #25,668 of 1,938,452 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #82,549 of 1,938,452 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.