God's non-existence: A reply to mr. Rainer and mr. Hughes
Mind 58 (231):352-354 (1949)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRichard Messer (1993). Does God's Existence Need Proof? Oxford University Press.
Michael Veber (2009). Reply on Behalf of Joe. Sophia 48 (4).
Christopher Hughes (1989). On a Complex Theory of a Simple God: An Investigation in Aquinas' Philosophical Theology. Cornell University Press.
David Twetten (2006). On Which 'God' Should Be the Target of a 'Proof of God's Existence'. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:75-80.
Jake H. O'Connell (2013). Divine Hiddenness: Would More Miracles Solve the Problem? Heythrop Journal 54 (2):261-267.
George I. Mavrodes (1970). The Rationality of Belief in God. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
G. E. Hughes (1970). Plantinga on the Rationality of God's Existence. Philosophical Review 79 (2):246-252.
Clement Dore (1986). A Reply to Professor Rowe. Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):314-318.
A. C. A. Rainer (1949). Necessity and God: A Reply to Professor Findlay. Mind 58 (229):75-77.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #134,983 of 556,895 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
