How to compare theories: Reference and change
Noûs 9 (1):17-32 (1975)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Natural Kinds | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEric H. Gampel (1997). Ethics, Reference, and Natural Kinds. Philosophical Papers 26 (2):147-63.
Chenyang Li (1993). Natural Kinds: Direct Reference, Realism, and the Impossibility of Necessary a Posteriori Truth. Review of Metaphysics 47 (2):261-76.
John S. Wilkins (forthcoming). Biological Essentialism and the Tidal Change of Natural Kinds. Science and Education.
Hartry Field (1973). Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference. Journal of Philosophy 70 (14):462-481.
Thomas A. C. Reydon (2009). Do the Life Sciences Need Natural Kinds? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):167-190.
Jussi Jylkkä (2008). Theories of Natural Kind Term Reference and Empirical Psychology. Philosophical Studies 139 (2):153-169.
Robert A. Wilson (2004). Review of Laporte on Natural Kinds. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 24:423-426.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads33 ( #36,590 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,124 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
