Coincidence and form
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):101-118 (2008)
| Abstract | How can a statue and a piece of alloy be coincident at any time at which they exist and yet differ in their modal properties? I argue that this question demands an answer and that the only plausible answer is one that posits a difference in the form of the two objects. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKaren Bennett (2004). Spatio-Temporal Coincidence and the Grounding Problem. Philosophical Studies 118 (3):339-371.
L. A. Paul (2010). The Puzzles of Material Constitution. Philosophy Compass 5 (7):579-590.
Ryan Wasserman (2002). The Standard Objection to the Standard Account. Philosophical Studies 111 (3):197 - 216.
Jeffrey C. King (2006). Semantics for Monists. Mind 115 (460):1023-1058.
Mark Moyer (2009). Does Four-Dimensionalism Explain Coincidence? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):479-488.
John Divers (2008). Coincidence and Form. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):119-137.
Mark Moyer (2006). Statues and Lumps: A Strange Coincidence? Synthese 148 (2):401 - 423.
Judith Crane (2012). Biological-Mereological Coincidence. Philosophical Studies 161 (2):309-325.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads190 ( #1,471 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #3,908 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
