No harm no foul? Objectivism and the law of attempts [Book Review]

Law and Philosophy 18 (1):69-84 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No Abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/3505064

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Virtue and the Reductivist Challenge.Michael Byron - 2000 - Contemporary Philosophy 22:34-41.
Examining the effects of moral development level, self-concept, and self-monitoring on consumers' ethical attitudes.Bahtışen Kavak, Eda Gürel, Canan Eryiğit & Öznur Özkan Tektaş - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):115 - 135.
No Harm, No Foul.Kenneth Einar Himma - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (2):172-194.
The moral limits of the criminal law.Joel Feinberg - 1984 - New York: Oxford University Press.
No Harm, No Foul? Justifying Bans On Safe Performance-Enhancing Drugs.John Gleaves - 2010 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (3):269-283.
Harm and culpability.A. P. Simester & A. T. H. Smith (eds.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Understanding Objectivism: A Guide to Learning Ayn Rand's Philosophy of Objectivism.Leonard Peikoff - 2012 - New American Library. Edited by Michael S. Berliner.
Why Punish Attempts at All? Yaffe on 'The Transfer Principle'.Douglas Husak - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):399-410.
Criminal Attempts and the Subjectivism/Objectivism Debate.Stephen Mathis - 2004 - Ratio Juris 17 (3):328-345.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#577,276)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Intention and Attempt.Vincent Chiao - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):37-55.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references