David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 42 (3):411 - 441 (1979)
This is meant to be a study in the philosophy of history of science as well as in informal logic. From the point of view of the latter, It is shown how the logical dimension of galileo's "two chief world systems" has been neglected by some of the best scholars, Through logically insensitive commentary, Transcription, And translation. From the point of view of the former, It is shown concretely how logical analysis can be relevant to history-Of-Science scholarship by helping it solve its own problems. From the point of view of galilean studies, A re-Examination of this crucial work is suggested
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tim Crane (2012). Philosophy, Logic, Science, History. Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):20-37.
Elizabeth A. Clark (2004). History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn. Harvard University Press.
Joost Mertens (1992). The Conceptual Structure of the Technological Sciences and the Importance of Action Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (2):333-348.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro (2011). Galilean Argumentation and the Inauthenticity of the Cigoli Letter on Painting Vs. Sculpture. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):492-508.
Thomas E. Uebel (1994). The Importance of Being Austrian. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (4):631-636.
Nicholas Rescher (2005). Collected Papers. Ontos Verlag.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro (2005). Arguments About Arguments: Systematic, Critical, and Historical Essays in Logical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Stuart Shanker (ed.) (1996). Philosophy of Science, Logic, and Mathematics in the Twentieth Century. Routledge.
Rein Vihalemm (ed.) (2001). Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
D. Wujastyk (1998). Science and Vedic Studies. Journal of Indian Philosophy 26 (4):335-345.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #256,538 of 1,410,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #178,988 of 1,410,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?