David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:235 - 246 (1978)
Feyerabend's views are construed as formulating the problem of determining the role of rhetoric in scientific rationality and posing the solution-theory that scientific rationality is essentially rhetorical. He is taken to give three arguments against reason, of which the one from the insufficiency of reason and the one from incommensurability are shown to presuppose his historical argument; his historical argument is based on his account of Galileo, which hinges essentially on Feyerabend's analysis of the tower argument. This analysis is insightful in certain important ways but misconceived in others. Feyerabend's main error is to see a conflict between reason and rhetoric, where none exists; it is argued that rhetorical devices have their own standards of propriety and impropriety, different from those of rational arguments, and that at the same time sound rhetorical analysis presupposes sound logical analysis.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
William K. Goosens (1980). Galileo's Response to the Tower Argument. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 11 (3):215-227.
Similar books and articles
Carmen Pérez-Llantada (2012). Scientific Discourse and the Rhetoric of Globalization: The Impact of Culture and Language. Continuum International Pub. Group.
John O'neill (1998). Rhetoric, Science, and Philosophy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (2):205--25.
Alfred Nordmann (1990). Goodbye and Farewell: Siegel Vs. Feyerabend. Inquiry 33 (3):317 – 331.
Andrew Lugg (1985). The Process of Discovery. Philosophy of Science 52 (2):207-220.
Rom Harré (1996). Rhetoric and Realism. Theoria 11 (1):41-47.
Michael A. Overington (1977). The Scientific Community as Audience: Toward a Rhetorical Analysis of Science. Philosophy and Rhetoric 10 (3):143 - 164.
Nicholas Rescher (1998). The Role of Rhetoric in Rational Argumentation. Argumentation 12 (2):315-323.
Wayne Backman (1983). Practical and Scientific Rationality: A Difficulty for Levi's Epistemology. Synthese 57 (3):269 - 276.
Kepa Korta (2002). Pragmatics and Rhetoric for Discourse Analysis: Some Conceptual Remarks. Manuscrito 25 (2).
Jeffrey J. Maciejewski (2005). Reason as a Nexus of Natural Law and Rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (3):247 - 257.
Donald G. Douglas (1973). Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views. Skokie, Ill.,National Textbook Co..
Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze (2008). On Reason: Rationality in a World of Cultural Conflict and Racism. Duke University Press.
Dudley Shapere (1988). Doppelt Crossed. Philosophy of Science 55 (1):134-140.
Gerald Doppelt (1988). The Philosophical Requirements for an Adequate Conception of Scientific Rationality. Philosophy of Science 55 (1):104-133.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads7 ( #188,579 of 1,103,046 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,567 of 1,103,046 )
How can I increase my downloads?