The role of 'dutch books' and of 'proper scoring rules'
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (1):55-56 (1981)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBruno de Finetti (1981). The Role of 'Dutch Books' and of 'Proper Scoring Rules'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (1):55-56.
Bruno De Finetti (1981). The Role of 'Dutch Books' and of 'Proper Scoring Rules'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (1):55 - 56.
Joel Predd, Robert Seiringer, Elliott Lieb, Daniel Osherson, H. Vincent Poor & Sanjeev Kulkarni (2009). Probabilistic Coherence and Proper Scoring Rules. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 55 (10):4786-4792.
Kathleen M. Whitcomb & P. George Benson (1996). Evaluating Second-Order Probability Judgments with Strictly Proper Scoring Rules. Theory and Decision 41 (2):165-178.
Brad Armendt (1992). Dutch Strategies for Diachronic Rules: When Believers See the Sure Loss Coming. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:217 - 229.
Susan Vineberg (1997). Dutch Books, Dutch Strategies and What They Show About Rationality. Philosophical Studies 86 (2):185-201.
Amir Konigsberg (2013). Epistemic Value and Epistemic Compromise, A Reply to Moss. Episteme 10 (1):87-97.
Dominique Lepelley, Patrick Pierron & Fabrice Valognes (2000). Scoring Rules, Condorcet Efficiency and Social Homogeneity. Theory and Decision 49 (2):175-196.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-02Total downloads7 ( #133,637 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
