Neuroethics 1 (1) (2008)
|Abstract||A number of recent popular books about gender differences have drawn on the neuroscientific literature to support the claim that certain psychological differences between the sexes are ‘hard-wired’. This article highlights some of the ethical implications that arise from both factual and conceptual errors propagated by such books.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Margaret S. Hrezo & John M. Parrish (eds.) (2010). Damned If You Do: Dilemmas of Action in Literature and Popular Culture. Lexington Books.
Claudia Bernard (forthcoming). Ethical Issues in Researching Black Teenage Mothers with Harmful Childhood Histories: Marginal Voices. Ethics and Social Welfare:1-20.
Dean Falk (2004). Prelinguistic Evolution in Early Hominins: Whence Motherese? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):491-503.
Lynda Lange (2009). Globalization and the Conceptual Effects of Boundaries Between Western Political Philosophy and Economic Theory. Social Philosophy Today 25:31-45.
Aaron Smuts (2012). Popular Art. In The Continuum Companion to Aesthetics. Continuum.
Marcus Hutter (2012). Can Intelligence Explode? Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (1-2):143-166.
Cordelia Fine (2012). Explaining, or Sustaining, the Status Quo? The Potentially Self-Fulfilling Effects of 'Hardwired' Accounts of Sex Differences. Neuroethics 5 (3):285-294.
Peggy DesAutels (2010). Sex Differences and Neuroethics. Philosophical Psychology 23 (1):95-111.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #53,879 of 549,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?