David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):271 – 287 (2005)
This commentary draws on the thoughtful contemplation and innovative procedures described in the special section articles as well as current professional codes and federal regulations to highlight ethical practices and paradoxes of deception research involving children. The discussion is organized around 4 key decision points for the conduct of responsible deception research involving children: (a) evaluating the scientific validity and social value of deception research within the context of alternative methodologies, (b) avoiding and minimizing experimental risk, (c) the use of child assent procedures as questionable ethical safeguards, and (d) debriefing as both remedy and risk.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Celia B. Fisher & Scyatta A. Wallace (2000). Through the Community Looking Glass: Reevaluating the Ethical and Policy Implications of Research on Adolescent Risk and Psychopathology. Ethics and Behavior 10 (2):99 – 118.
Celia B. Fisher (1999). Relational Ethics and Research with Vulnerable Populations. Reports on Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders That May Affect Decision-Making Capacity 2:29-49.
David D. Rutstein (forthcoming). JL O The Ethical Design of Human Experiments. Bioethics: Basic Writings on the Key Ethical Questions That Surround the Major, Modern Biological Possibilities and Problems.
Celia B. Fisher (2003). A Goodness-of-Fit Ethic for Child Assent to Nonbeneficial Research. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):27 – 28.
Citations of this work BETA
Roseanna Sommers & Franklin G. Miller (2013). Forgoing Debriefing in Deceptive Research: Is It Ever Ethical? Ethics and Behavior 23 (2):98-116.
Similar books and articles
Bryan Benham (2008). Moral Accountability and Debriefing. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):pp. 253-273.
David J. Pittenger (2002). Deception in Research: Distinctions and Solutions From the Perspective of Utilitarianism. Ethics and Behavior 12 (2):117 – 142.
Lisa Bortolotti & Matteo Mameli (2006). Deception in Psychology : Moral Costs and Benefits of Unsought Self-Knowledge. Accountability in Research 13:259-275.
Lorraine Young & Hazel Barrett (2001). Ethics and Participation: Reflections on Research with Street Children. Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (2):130 – 134.
Daniel A. Griffith (2008). Ethical Considerations in Geographic Research: What Especially Graduate Students Need to Know. Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (3):237 – 252.
Joan E. Sieber (2008). Empirical Research on Ethical Issues in Pediatric Research. Ethics and Behavior 18 (2 & 3):127 – 138.
Allan J. Kimmel, N. Craig Smith & Jill Gabrielle Klein (2011). Ethical Decision Making and Research Deception in the Behavioral Sciences: An Application of Social Contract Theory. Ethics and Behavior 21 (3):222 - 251.
Terrence F. Ackerman (1980). Moral Duties of Parents and Nontherapeutic Clinical Research Procedures Involving Children. Bioethics Quarterly 2 (2):94-111.
Allan J. Kimmel (2001). Ethical Trends in Marketing and Psychological Research. Ethics and Behavior 11 (2):131 – 149.
Franklin G. Miller John P. Gluck David Wendler Jr (2008). Debriefing and Accountability in Deceptive Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):pp. 235-251.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #103,318 of 1,907,521 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,819 of 1,907,521 )
How can I increase my downloads?