In Sarah Buss & Lee Overton (eds.), Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes From Harry Frankfurt. MIT Press, Bradford Books (2002)
|Abstract||In this essay I shall begin by sketching a "Frankfurt-type example." I shall then lay out a disturbing challenge to the claim I have made above that these examples help us to make significant progress in the debates about the relationship between moral responsibility and causal determinism. I then will provide a reply to this challenge, and the reply will point toward a more refined formulation of the important contribution I believe Frankfurt has made to defending a certain sort of compatibilism.|
|Keywords||Compatibilism Metaphysics Frankfurt, H|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
By Ishtiyaque Haji (2008). Dispositional Compatibilism and Frankfurt-Type Examples. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (2):226–241.
Paul Russell (2002). Responsibility and Control. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32:587-606.
Michael S. McKenna (2005). Where Frankfurt and Strawson Meet. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):163-180.
V. Alan White (1998). Frankfurt, Failure, and Finding Fault. Sorites 9 (9):47-52.
Michael S. McKenna (1998). Does Strong Compatibilism Survive Frankfurt-Style Counterexamples? Philosophical Studies 91 (3):259-64.
Michael Della Rocca (1998). Frankfurt, Fischer and Flickers. Noûs 32 (1):99-105.
Bindu Madhok (2002). The Price of Frankfurt's Compatibilism. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:577-584.
John Martin Fischer (2002). Frankfurt-Type Examples and Semi-Compatibilism. In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford University Press.
John Martin Fischer (2007). The Importance of Frankfurt-Style Argument. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):464–471.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads97 ( #6,567 of 549,068 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,311 of 549,068 )
How can I increase my downloads?