Responsibility and the Kinds of Freedom

Journal of Ethics 12 (3/4):203 - 228 (2008)
In this paper I seek to identify different sorts of freedom putatively linked to moral responsibility; I then explore the relationship between such notions of freedom and the Consequence Argument, on the one hand, and the Frankfurt-examples, on the other. I focus (in part) on a dilemma: if a compatibilist adopts a broadly speaking "conditional" understanding of freedom in reply to the Consequence Argument, such a theorist becomes vulnerable in a salient way to the Frankfurt-examples
Keywords Compatibilism  Conditional analysis of freedom  Consequence Argument  Harry G. Frankfurt  Frankfurt-examples  Freedom  Free will  Guidance control  Incompatibilism  Moral responsibility  Regulative control  T. M. Scanlon  R. Jay Wallace  Gary Watson
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,205
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Robert Merrihew Adams (1985). Involuntary Sins. Philosophical Review 94 (1):3-31.
Joel Feinberg (1978). The Interest in Liberty on the Scales. In A. I. Goldman & I. Kim (eds.), Values and Morals. Boston: D. Reidel 21--35.

View all 38 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

138 ( #10,366 of 1,699,481 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #47,237 of 1,699,481 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.