David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 20 (1-4):189 – 203 (1977)
Wittgenstein's private language argument is interpreted as an example of a kind of transcendental argument which, if valid, explains why a certain concept must possess certain features. Cognition and affect are shown to require each other by an application of Bennett's account of what beings capable of true cognition must be capable of, and the necessity of certain emotions to the existence of any rules in a community is argued in similar fashion. Hume's account of love and admiration being rejected, an account of love, intended to explain some of love's familiar features, is defended, and various proposed additions to the analysis are rejected. The idea of love is linked to those of value, agency, and the transcendental self by argument showing that each of these ideas requires all of the others. Finally, the idea of love is linked by a direct argument to that of the transcendental self.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bennett W. Helm, Love. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Robert Brown (1987). Analyzing Love. Cambridge University Press.
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
S. Matthew Liao (2006). The Idea of a Duty to Love. Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (1):1-22.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads33 ( #52,302 of 1,101,079 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #115,886 of 1,101,079 )
How can I increase my downloads?