The relationship between political attitudes and moral judgment: Examining the validity of the defining issues test [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8):905-916 (1998)
|Abstract||Most ethics studies employing accounting subjects have utilized the Defining Issues <span class='Hi'>Test</span> (DIT), generally finding the moral judgment abilities of accounting students and accountants to be less advanced than those of the general population (Ponemon and Gabhart, 1994). This study assesses the validity of the DIT by examining whether an individual can achieve a higher moral judgment score on the DIT by responding from the role of a political liberal. Accounting undergraduates, defining themselves as liberal, moderate or conservative, completed the DIT once from their own perspective and once from either an "extremely conservative" or "extremely liberal" perspective.The results indicate that DIT scores can be influenced by an aspect of political ideology not reflecting maturation in moral judgment. Subjects decreased their moral judgment scores when responding to the DIT dilemmas from a conservative perspective. Contrary to moral development theory, subjects were able to increase their moral judgment scores when responding from the perspective of a political liberal. These results imply that, given the generally conservative political orientation of the profession, the DIT may systematically understate the moral judgment abilities of accounting students and accountants.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Matthew Jason Borenstein, Robert Kirkman J. Drake & L. Swann Julie (2010). The Engineering and Science Issues Test (Esit): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgment. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2).
Mohammad J. Abdolmohammadi & C. Richard Baker (2006). Accountants' Value Preferences and Moral Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (1):11 - 25.
Tara J. Shawver & John T. Sennetti (2009). Measuring Ethical Sensitivity and Evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):663 - 678.
Wilton H. Bunch (2005). Changing Moral Judgement in Divinity Students. Journal of Moral Education 34 (3):363-370.
Dawn R. Elm & James Weber (1994). Measuring Moral Judgment: The Moral Judgment Interview or the Defining Issues Test? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (5):341 - 355.
Chiharu Ishida (2006). How Do Scores of DIT and MJT Differ? A Critical Assessment of the Use of Alternative Moral Development Scales in Studies of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (1):63 - 74.
Terri Lee Robinett (2008). A Comparison of Moral Reasoning Stages Using a Model of Hierarchical Complexity. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):468 – 479.
Jeanette A. Lawrence (1980). Moral Judgment Intervention Studies Using the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Moral Education 9 (3):178-191.
Tim West, Sue Ravenscroft & Charles Shrader (2004). Cheating and Moral Judgment in the College Classroom: A Natural Experiment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 54 (2):173 - 183.
Jacqueline L. Reck (2000). Ethics and Budget Allocation Decisions of Municipal Budget Officers. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (4):335 - 350.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #95,683 of 739,518 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,518 )
How can I increase my downloads?