David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Noûs 43 (3):531-556 (2009)
Control-based models of moral responsibility typically employ a notion of "tracing," according to which moral responsibility requires an exercise of control either immediately prior to the behavior in question or at some suitable point prior to the behavior. Responsibility, on this view, requires tracing back to control. But various philosophers, including Manuel Vargas and Angela Smith, have presented cases in which the plausibility of tracing is challenged. In this paper we discuss the examples and we argue that they do not in fact impugn an attractive and natural tracing component. Our discussion can function in part as a defense of a control-based account of moral responsibility, but also as simply a defense of tracing.
|Keywords||tracing moral responsibility Manuel Vargas Angela Smith|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza (1998). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
Derek Parfit (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.
Robert H. Kane (1996). The Significance of Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Derk Pereboom (2001). Living Without Free Will. Cambridge University Press.
Angela M. Smith (2005). Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life. Ethics 115 (2):236-271.
Citations of this work BETA
John Danaher (2016). Human Enhancement, Social Solidarity and the Distribution of Responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2):359-378.
Chandra Sripada (2016). Self-Expression: A Deep Self Theory of Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Studies 173 (5):1203-1232.
Sanford C. Goldberg (forthcoming). Should Have Known. Synthese:1-32.
Christopher Evan Franklin (2011). Neo-Frankfurtians and Buffer Cases: The New Challenge to the Principle of Alternative Possibilities. Philosophical Studies 152 (2):189–207.
Alfred Mele (2011). Moral Responsibility for Actions: Epistemic and Freedom Conditions. Philosophical Explorations 13 (2):101-111.
Similar books and articles
Edward J. Hughes (1995). How Subjectivity Is Truth in the "Concluding Unscientific Postscript". Religious Studies 31 (2):197-208.
Richard Campbell (1992). Truth and Historicity. Oxford University Press.
Matt King (2014). Traction Without Tracing: A Solution for Control‐Based Accounts of Moral Responsibility. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):463-482.
John Martin Fischer, Patrick Todd & Neal A. Tognazzini (2009). Engaging with Pike: God, Freedom, and Time. Philosophical Papers 38 (2):247-270.
Holly Smith (2011). Non-Tracing Cases of Culpable Ignorance. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (2):115-146.
Richard James Campbell (2011). The Concept of Truth. Palgrave Macmillan.
Donald Davidson (2005). Truth and Predication. Harvard University Press.
John MacFarlane (2008). Truth in the Garden of Forking Paths. In Max KâObel & Manuel Garcia-Carpintero (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press 81--102.
Patrick Todd & John Martin Fischer (2011). The Truth About Freedom: A Reply to Merricks. Philosophical Review 120 (1):97 - 115.
John Martin Fischer & Neal A. Tognazzini (2011). The Physiognomy of Responsibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):381-417.
Added to index2009-08-27
Total downloads97 ( #40,420 of 1,793,096 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #64,593 of 1,793,096 )
How can I increase my downloads?