Through the community looking glass: Reevaluating the ethical and policy implications of research on adolescent risk and psychopathology
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 10 (2):99 – 118 (2000)
Drawing on a conception of scientists and community members as partners in the construction of ethically responsible research practices, this article urges investigators to seek the perspectives of teenagers and parents in evaluating the personal and political costs and benefits of research on adolescent risk behaviors. Content analysis of focus group discussions involving over 100 parents and teenagers from diverse ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds revealed community opinions regarding the scientific merit, social value, racial bias, and participant and group harms and benefits associated with surveys, informant reports, intervention studies, blood sampling, and genetic research on youth problems. Participant comments highlight new directions for socially responsible research.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Diane K. Wagener, Amy K. Sporer, Mary Simmerling, Jennifer L. Flome, Christina An & Susan J. Curry (2004). Human Participants Challenges in Youth-Focused Research: Perspectives and Practices of IRB Administrators. Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):335 – 349.
Laurie J. Bauman, Jamie Heather Sclafane, Marni LoIacono, Ken Wilson & Ruth Macklin (2008). Ethical Issues in HIV/STD Prevention Research with High Risk Youth: Providing Help, Preserving Validity. Ethics and Behavior 18 (2 & 3):247 – 265.
Charles Weijer, The Ethical Analysis of Risks and Potential Benefits in Human Subjects Research: History, Theory, and Implications for U.S. Regulation.
Terry Dunbar & Margaret Scrimgeour (2006). Ethics in Indigenous Research – Connecting with Community. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):179-185.
Colleen Reid & Elana Brief (2009). Confronting Condescending Ethics: How Community-Based Research Challenges Traditional Approaches to Consent, Confidentiality, and Capacity. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):75-85.
Janet Malek (2007). Understanding Risks and Benefits in Research on Reproductive Genetic Technologies. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):339 – 358.
Celia B. Fisher (2005). Deception Research Involving Children: Ethical Practices and Paradoxes. Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):271 – 287.
Celia B. Fisher (1994). Reporting and Referring Research Participants: Ethical Challenges for Investigators Studying Children and Youth. Ethics and Behavior 4 (2):87 – 95.
Celia B. Fisher (2003). Adolescent and Parent Perspectives on Ethical Issues in Youth Drug Use and Suicide Survey Research. Ethics and Behavior 13 (4):303 – 332.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #132,704 of 1,096,895 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #40,366 of 1,096,895 )
How can I increase my downloads?