Accuracy & Coherence II

Comparative. Let C be the full set of S’s comparative judgments over B × B. The innaccuracy of C at a world w is given by the number of incorrect judgments in C at w
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,831
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Barbara von Eckardt (1994). The Notion of Accuracy in Current Social Perception Research. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:35 - 46.
Paul Thagard (1998). Ethical Coherence. Philosophical Psychology 11 (4):405 – 422.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

11 ( #212,738 of 1,724,747 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #210,951 of 1,724,747 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.