Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
|Abstract||There is an obvious difference between what a term designates and what it means. At least it is obvious that there is a difference. In some way, meaning determines designation, but is not synonymous with it. After all, “the morning star” and “the evening star” both designate the planet Venus, but don't have the same meaning. Intensional logic attempts to study both designation and meaning and investigate the relationships between them|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Pavel Tichý (1986). Indiscernibility of Identicals. Studia Logica 45 (3):251 - 273.
Matt Fairtlough & Michael Mendler (2003). Intensional Completeness in an Extension of Gödel/Dummett Logic. Studia Logica 73 (1):51 - 80.
Edward N. Zalta (1988). A Comparison of Two Intensional Logics. Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (1):59-89.
Imre Ruzsa (1981). An Approach to Intensional Logic. Studia Logica 40 (3):269 - 287.
Reinhard Muskens (2007). Intensional Models for the Theory of Types. Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (1):98-118.
E. H. Alves & J. A. D. Guerzoni (1990). Extending Montague's System: A Three Valued Intensional Logic. Studia Logica 49 (1):127 - 132.
Daniel Gallin (1975). Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic: With Applications to Montague Semantics. American Elsevier Pub. Co..
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #84,232 of 556,840 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )
How can I increase my downloads?