David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kleene’s strong three-valued logic extends naturally to a four-valued logic proposed by Belnap. We introduce a guard connective into Belnap’s logic and consider a few of its properties. Then we show that by using it four-valued analogs of Kleene’s weak three-valued logic, and the asymmetric logic of Lisp are also available. We propose an extension of these ideas to the family of distributive bilattices. Finally we show that for bilinear bilattices the extensions do not produce any new equivalences.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Arnon Avron (2005). A Non-Deterministic View on Non-Classical Negations. Studia Logica 80 (2-3):159 - 194.
Similar books and articles
A. Avron & B. Konikowska (2008). Rough Sets and 3-Valued Logics. Studia Logica 90 (1):69 - 92.
Beata Konikowska (1990). A Two-Valued Logic for Reasoning About Different Types of Consequence in Kleene's Three-Valued Logic. Studia Logica 49 (4):541 - 555.
Arnon Avron & Beata Konikowska (2009). Proof Systems for Reasoning About Computation Errors. Studia Logica 91 (2):273 - 293.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Amit Malhotra (2002). How to Avoid Deviance (in Logic). History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):215--36.
Added to index2009-06-23
Total downloads28 ( #111,105 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #99,332 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?