The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications
Cognition 97:179-210 (2005)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||Response to Pinker and Jackendoff language faculty|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Willem Zuidema & Bart de Boer (2003). How Did We Get From There to Here in the Evolution of Language? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):694-695.
Ray Jackendoff & Steven Pinker (2005). The Faculty of Language: What's Special About It? Cognition 95 (2):201-236.
John M. Collins (2005). Faculty Disputes. Mind and Language 19 (5):503-33.
Barry C. Smith (2008). What Remains of Our Knowledge of Language? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):557-75.
Marc Hauser, Chomsky D., Fitch Noam & W. Tecumseh (2002). The Faculty of Language: What is It, Who has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science 298 (22):1569-1579.
Steven Pinker (2005). The Nature of the Language Faculty and its Implications for Evolution of Language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition 97 (2):211-225.
Ray Jackendoff (2005). The Nature of the Language Faculty and its Implications for Evolution of Language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition 97 (2):211-225.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-09-11
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?