David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):116-121 (2007)
This monograph treats the important topic of the epistemology of diagrams in Euclidean geometry. Norman argues that diagrams play a genuine justificatory role in traditional Euclidean arguments, and he aims to account for these roles from a modified Kantian perspective. Norman considers himself a semi-Kantian in the following broad sense: he believes that Kant was right that ostensive constructions are necessary in order to follow traditional Euclidean proofs, but he wants to avoid appealing to Kantian a priori intuition as the epistemological background for these constructions.Norman's main argument is limited to the thesis that certain Euclidean arguments—in particular, that of Proposition 1.32, the internal-angle-sum theorem—require inferences from diagrams. Interestingly, Norman is not committed to the view that these arguments are proofs. This becomes clear only quite late in the book, when he distinguishes argument from proofs, remarking that the argument he has been focusing on is not rigorous, and so is not a proof . Norman does not, however, explicitly classify all Euclidean arguments as non-proofs. His view is that diagrammatic reasoning can in principle feature in rigorous proofs, but he is not committed to the thesis that any particular argument, Euclidean or otherwise, provides an example of this. Rather than proofs in particular, Norman is more interested in the general issue of justification in mathematics.The argument has three components. First, Norman argues against competing accounts of Euclidean arguments such as empiricism, and ‘Leibnizianism’—the view that diagrams play only a heuristic role. Second, he provides a more direct, or positive, argument that the way we actually follow the standard argument for 1.32 does appeal to the diagram. This is an appeal to the phenomenology of following the argument. Third, he articulates and defends his semi-Kantian position against some objections.The book has a very careful and …
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
D. Gillies (2007). Maria Carla Galavotti. Philosophical Introduction to Probability. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications, 2005. Pp. X + 265. ISBN 1-57586-490-8 (Pbk), 1-57586-489-4 (Hardback). [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):129-132.
F. Muller (2004). Patrick Suppes, Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures, CSLI Publications, Stanford, California (Distributed by Chicago University Press), ISBN 1-57586-333-2, 2002 (Pp. Ix+536, US $50.00). [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):713-720.
John Mumma (2008). Nathaniel Miller. Euclid and His Twentieth Century Rivals: Diagrams in the Logic of Euclidean Geometry. Csli Studies in the Theory and Applications of Diagrams. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):256-264.
Paul Buitelaar (2005). Book Review: Word Sense Disambiguation: The Case for Combinations of Knowledge Sources, Mark Stevenson, Chicago IL, U.S.A.: The University of Chicago Press, 2003. Price: $25.00, XIII + 175 Pages, Paperback, ISBN 1-57586-390-. [REVIEW] Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (2):253-259.
Ari Gross (2012). Pictures and Pedagogy: The Role of Diagrams in Feynman's Early Lectures. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 43 (3):184-194.
Marco Panza (2012). The Twofold Role of Diagrams in Euclid's Plane Geometry. Synthese 186 (1):55-102.
Klaas J. Kraay (2002). Externalism and Self-Knowledge Peter Ludlow and Norah Martin, Editors Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1998, X + 382 Pp., $40.60. [REVIEW] Dialogue 41 (01):177-.
Jesse Norman (2004). Review: The Philosophical Status of Diagrams. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):801-805.
W. A. Laidlaw (1951). Ictus and Accent Philip Whaley Harsh: Iambic Words and Regard for Accent in Plautus. (Stanford University Publications, Language and Literature, Vol. VII, No. 2). Pp. 149. Stanford, California; Stanford University Press (London: Oxford University Press), 1949. Paper, $2.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 1 (01):32-34.
John Mumma (2010). Proofs, Pictures, and Euclid. Synthese 175 (2):255 - 287.
A. T. Nuyen (1995). Book Reviews : John Martin Fischer, Ed., The Metaphysics of Death. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1993. Pp. Xiv, 423. Price $45.00 (Cloth), $16.95 (Paper). Jacques Derrida, Aporias. Translated by Thomas Dutoit. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1993. Pp. X, 87. Price $29.50 (Cloth), $12.95 (Paper). Zygmunt Bauman, Mortality, Immortality and Other Life Strategies. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1992. Pp. 215. Price $39.50 (Cloth), $14.95 (Paper. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (4):539-545.
Vivienne Gray (2006). Azoulay (V.) Xénophon et les grâces du pouvoir. De la charis au charisme . (Histoire Ancienne et Médiévale 77.) Pp. 511. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 2004. Paper, €28. ISBN: 2-85944-509-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 56 (01):43-.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads20 ( #177,437 of 1,790,246 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #427,635 of 1,790,246 )
How can I increase my downloads?