Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352 (2002)
|Abstract||I critique Peter Singer’s view that equality across species is a natural extension of equality. Singer presents one minor and two major arguments. The first major argument is that equality across species is implied by the traditional principle of equality. The second is that it follows from a conception that is behind the principle of equality, namely the moral “point of view of the universe.” The minor argument is a theory of the altruistic character and expanding circles of ethics|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kenneth Baynes (0040). Democratic Equality and Respect. Theoria 53 (=117;User_Persona=false;ord=1234):1-25.
Edo Pivčević (2003). Equality and Morality. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):75-92.
Martin W. Bunder, J. Roger Hindley & Jonathan P. Seldin (1989). On Adding (Ξ) to Weak Equality in Combinatory Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):590-607.
Prof Laurence Thomas (2003). Upside-Down Equality: A Response to Kantian Thought. In [Book Chapter] (in Press).
Richard Arneson (2008). Justice is Not Equality. Ratio 21 (4):371-391.
Madison Powers (1996). Forget About Equality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):129-144.
Harry Brighouse (2007). Equality of Opportunity and Complex Equality: The Special Place of Schooling. [REVIEW] Res Publica 13 (2):147-158.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,679 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?