David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Basic Books (2003)
Traditional ideas about the basic nature of humanity are under attack as never before. The very attributes that make us human--free will, the permanence of personal identity, the existence of the soul--are being undermined and threatened by the current revolution in the science of the mind. If the mind is the brain, and therefore a physical object subject to deterministic laws, how can we have free will? If most of our thoughts and impulses are unconscious, how can we be morally responsible for what we do? The Problem of the Soul shows the way out of these seemingly intractable paradoxes. Framing the conflict in terms of two dominant visions of the mind--the "manifest image" of humanistic philosophy and theology, and the scientific image--renowned philosopher Owen Flanagan demonstrates that there is, in fact, common ground, and that we need not give up our ideas of moral responsibility and personal freedom in order to have an empirically sound view of the human mind
|Keywords||Brain Ethics Free Will Metaphysics Mind Science Soul|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$2.98 used (90% off) $7.95 new (72% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BD450.F535 2002|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John F. Haught (2009). Theology, Evolution, and the Human Mind: How Much Can Biology Explain? Zygon 44 (4):921-931.
Thomas B. Ellis (2012). Growing Up Amid the Religion and Science Affair: A Perspective From Indology. Zygon 47 (3):589-607.
Tibor Solymosi (2011). Neuropragmatism, Old and New. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (3):347-368.
Owen Flanagan & Robert Anthony Williams (2010). What Does the Modularity of Morals Have to Do With Ethics? Four Moral Sprouts Plus or Minus a Few. Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):430-453.
Paul Voelker (2011). Materialist Spirituality? Zygon 46 (2):451-460.
Similar books and articles
Rodney Cotterill (1989). No Ghost in the Machine: Modern Science and the Brain, the Mind, and the Soul. Heinemann.
Marleen Rozemond (2014). The Faces of Simplicity in Descartes’s Soul. In Dominik Perler & Klaus Corcilius (eds.), Partitioning the Soul: Debates From Plato to Leibniz. De Gruyter. 219-244.
William M. Baum (1998). Why Not Ask “Does the Chimpanzee Have a Soul?”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):116-116.
Stewart Goetz (2011). A Brief History of the Soul. Wiley-Blackwell.
Harald Walach (2007). Mind -- Body -- Spirituality. Mind and Matter 5 (2):215-240.
Shai Frogel (2010). The Soul: An Existentialist Point of View. [REVIEW] Human Studies 33 (2):191-204.
Tim Crane (1999). The Mind-Body Problem. In Rob Wilson & Frank Keil (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. MIT Press.
Timothy O'Connor (2000). Causality, Mind, and Free Will. Noûs 34 (s14):105-117.
Richard Swinburne (1986). The Evolution of the Soul. Oxford University Press.
Grant R. Gillett (1985). Brain, Mind and Soul. Zygon 20 (December):425-434.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads74 ( #23,671 of 1,679,294 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #19,409 of 1,679,294 )
How can I increase my downloads?