A Critique of John Dewey's Theory of the Nature and the Knowledge of Reality in the Light of the Principles of Thomism
Graduate studies at Western
Washington, Catholic University of America Press (1954)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frank X. Ryan (2001). Dewey's Empirical Theory of Knowledge and Reality (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):312-314.
Jerome A. Shaffer (1971). Reality, Knowledge, and Value. New York,Random House.
Paul Horwich (2010). Truth-Meaning-Reality. Oxford University Press.
Larry A. Hickman (2001). Dewey's Empirical Theory of Knowledge and Reality. The Review of Metaphysics 54 (3):684-685.
Jerry Davidson Wheatley (2001). The Nature of Consciousness, the Structure of Reality. Research Scientific Press.
Michael V. Antony (forthcoming). Can We Acquire Knowledge of Ultimate Reality? In Jeanine Diller & Asa Kasher (eds.), Models of God and Other Ultimate Realities. Springer.
Thomas Alexander (2008). Comments on James Good, a Search for Unity in Diversity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 563-568.
Roger Trigg (1980). Reality at Risk: A Defence of Realism in Philosophy and the Sciences. Barnes & Noble Books.
John R. Shook (2000). Dewey's Empirical Theory of Knowledge and Reality. Vanderbilt University Press.
Anne Mary Tamme (1956). A Critique of John Dewey's Theory of Fine Art in the Light of the Principles of Thomism. Washington, Catholic University of America Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-09-15
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?