David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Economics and Philosophy 28 (2):201-216 (2012)
This rejoinder to Roemer (this issue) examines Roemer's amendment to his EOp criterion, explains the similarities and differences between Roemer's approach to equality of opportunity and the economic literature inspired by the fair allocation theory, and proposes some clarifications on the compensation principle and the role of the reward principle in the definition of a responsibility-sensitive social criterion. It highlights the power of the ideal of respect for individual preferences with respect to the reward issue and the concern for potential harshness of the social criterion toward the individuals who fail to make good use of their opportunities. It discusses Roemer's objection against holding individuals responsible for their preferences
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mathias Risse (2002). What Equality of Opportunity Could Not Be. Ethics 112 (4):720-747.
Matthias Hild & Alex Voorhoeve (2004). Equality of Opportunity and Opportunity Dominance. Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):117-145.
Rodney G. Peffer, What is to Be Distributed? The Paideia Project.
John E. Roemer (1992). Providing Equal Educational Opportunity: Public Vs. Voucher Schools. Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (01):291-.
Alex Voorhoeve (2005). Equal Opportunity, Equality, and Responsibility. Dissertation, University of London
John E. Roemer (2012). On Several Approaches to Equality of Opportunity. Economics and Philosophy 28 (2):165-200.
Tyler Cowen (2002). John E. Roemer, Equality of Opportunity:Equality of Opportunity. Ethics 112 (3):637-639.
Alexander W. Cappelen & Bertil Tungodden (2003). Reward and Responsibility: How Should We Be Affected When Others Change Their Effort? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):191-211.
John E. Roemer (2003). Defending Equality of Opportunity. The Monist 86 (2):261-282.
M. Fleurbaey (2012). The Importance of What People Care About. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (4):415-447.
D. M. Hausman (2011). Mistakes About Preferences in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (1):3-25.
Clare Chambers (2009). Each Outcome is Another Opportunity: Problems with the Moment of Equal Opportunity. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (4):374-400.
Jeffrey Moriarty (2009). Rawls, Self-Respect, and the Opportunity for Meaningful Work. Social Theory and Practice 35 (3):441-459.
John K. Davis (2004). Precedent Autonomy and Subsequent Consent. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):267-291.
Richard J. Arneson (1999). Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity. Philosophical Studies 93 (1):77-112.
Added to index2012-08-30
Total downloads13 ( #119,482 of 1,099,048 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #33,832 of 1,099,048 )
How can I increase my downloads?