Infant feeding and hiv in sub-Saharan Africa: What lies beneath the dilemma?
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (5):307-330 (2008)
| Abstract | The debate over how to best guide HIV-infected mothers in resource-poor settings on infant feeding is more than two decades old. Globally, breastfeeding is responsible for approximately 300,000 HIV infections per year, while at the same time, UNICEF estimates that not breastfeeding (formula feeding with contaminated water) is responsible for 1.5 million child deaths per year. The largest burden of these infections and deaths occur in Sub-Saharan Africa. Using this region as an example of the burden faced more generally in other resource-poor settings, we contrast the evolution of the clinical standard of care for infant feeding with HIV-infected mothers in high-income countries to the current international clinical guidelines for HIV-infected mothers and infant feeding in resource-poor settings. While the international guidelines of exclusive breastfeeding for a 6-month period seem to offer the least-worst strategy for reducing mother-to-child transmission of HIV during infancy while conferring some immunity through breastfeeding post-6 months, we argue that the impact of the policy on mothers and healthcare workers on the ground is not well understood. The harm reduction approach on the level of health policy translates into a complicated, painful moral dilemma for HIV-positive mothers and those offering them guidance on infant feeding. We argue that the underlying socio-economic disparities that continue to fuel the need for a harm reduction policy on infant feeding and the harm to women and children justify: (1) that higher priority be given to solving the infant feeding dilemma with improved data on safe feeding alternatives, and (2) support of innovative, community-driven solutions that address the particular economic and cultural challenges that continue to result in HIV-transmission to children within these communities. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKjell Arne Johansson, Kirsten Bjerkreim Pedersen & Anna-Karin Andersson (2011). Hiv Testing of Pregnant Women: An Ethical Analysis. Developing World Bioethics 11 (3):109-119.
David Rygl, Markus G. Kittler & Carina Friedmann (2007). Fighting HIV/AIDS. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:189-205.
A. Dhai (2008). Hiv and Aids in Africa: Social, Political, and Economic Realities. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (5):293-296.
Russell Armstrong (2008). Mandatory Hiv Testing in Pregnancy: Is There Ever a Time? Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):1–10.
Rebecca Kukla (2006). Ethics and Ideology in Breastfeeding Advocacy Campaigns. Hypatia 21 (1):157-181.
Viva C. Thorsen, Johanne Sundby & Francis Martinson (2008). Potential Initiators of Hiv-Related Stigmatization: Ethical and Programmatic Challenges for Pmtct Programs. Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):43–50.
Erin N. Taylor & Lora Ebert Wallace (2012). For Shame: Feminism, Breastfeeding Advocacy, and Maternal Guilt. Hypatia 27 (1):76-98.
J. Nihlen Fahlquist & S. Roeser (2011). Ethical Problems with Information on Infant Feeding in Developed Countries. Public Health Ethics 4 (2):192-202.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #180,404 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
