Prediction in Social Science - The Case of Research on the Human Resource Management-Organisational Performance Link [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2):228-250 (2006)
_ Source: _Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 228 - 250 Despite inroads made by critical realism against the ‘scientific method’ in social science, the latter remains strong in subject-areas like human resource management. One argument for the alleged superiority of the scientific method lies in the taken-for-granted belief that it alone can formulate empirically testable predictions. Many of those who employ the scientific method are, however, confused about the way they understand and practice prediction. This paper takes as a case study empirical research on the alleged empirical association between human resource management practices and organisational performance. By unpacking the confusion surrounding the two basic notions of prediction used, it reveals what is wrong with them, why the scientific method cannot actually make accurate predictions and why, therefore, the scientific method fails to meet its own criteria for scientificity. Finally, explanation is considered in order to prevent any confusion between it and prediction and to offer what we call _tendential prediction_
|Keywords||performance scientism prediction tendential prediction human resource management explanation|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jan Ch Karlsson (2011). People Can Not Only Open Closed Systems, They Can Also Close Open Systems. Journal of Critical Realism 10 (2):145-162.
Similar books and articles
Kristin Andrews (2003). Knowing Mental States: The Asymmetry of Psychological Prediction and Explanation. In Quentin Smith & Aleksandar Jokic (eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press
Michael Strevens (2006). Scientific Explanation. In D. M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, second edition.
Neil Tennant (2010). The Logical Structure of Scientific Explanation and Prediction: Planetary Orbits in a Sun's Gravitational Field. Studia Logica 95 (1/2):207 - 232.
Belaid Rettab, Anis Ben Brik & Kamel Mellahi (2009). A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (3):371 - 390.
Fernando Martín-Alcázar, Pedro M. Romero-Fernández & Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey (2012). Transforming Human Resource Management Systems to Cope with Diversity. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (4):511-531.
Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (2001). Lakatos's Approach on Prediction and Novel Facts. Theoria 16 (3):499-518.
John Canfield & Keith Lehrer (1961). A Note on Prediction and Deduction. Philosophy of Science 28 (2):204-208.
Berel Lang (1983). Earthquake Prediction: Testing the Ground. Environmental Ethics 5 (1):3-19.
Steve Fleetwood & Anthony Hesketh (2006). Prediction in Social Science — The Case of Research on the Human Resource Management-Organisational Performance Link. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2):228-250.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads11 ( #221,582 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #264,053 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?