David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (1):229 (1996)
For people to live together in pluralistic communities, they must find someway to cope with the practices of others that they abhor. For that reason, tolerance has always seemed an appealing medium of accommodation. But tolerance also has its critics. One wing charges that the tolerant are too easygoing. They are insensitive to evil in their midst. At the same time, another wing attacks the tolerant for being too weak in their sentimentsof respect. “The Christian does not wish to be tolerated,” as T. S. Eliot said; and by this he meant to claim, presumably, that the Christian desires respect and acceptance, and not merely the forbearance suggested by “tolerance.” To make the case for tolerance, we must engage in a three-front campaign: first, against intolerance; second, against the moral failing of indifference; and third, against the desirability of respecting and accepting everyone. The central claim in making this case will be that unlike these three competing sentiments, tolerance is a complex attitude toward the behavior and beliefs of others. Its complexity consists in both moral disapproval and the avoidance of interference. If there is a case to be made for tolerance, it must derive from this peculiar complexity. After surveying its alternatives, I will argue that the complex sentimentof tolerance is more readily praised than its alternatives
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Paul Wolff (1969). A Critique of Pure Tolerance. Boston, Beacon Press.
Lasse Thomassen (2006). The Inclusion of the Other? Habermas and the Paradox of Tolerance. Political Theory 34 (4):439 - 462.
Lourdes Gordillo (2008). The Principle of Toleration and Respect for Truth. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 20:77-94.
Andrew Fiala (2003). Stoic Tolerance. Res Publica 9 (2):149-168.
András Kertész (2012). The 'Galilean Style in Science' and the Inconsistency of Linguistic Theorising. Foundations of Science 17 (1):91-108.
James J. Delaney & Jeffrey Dueck (2003). A Rethinking of Contemporary Religious Tolerance. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:73-82.
Yanguang Wang (2000). A Strategy of Clinical Tolerance for the Prevention of Hiv and Aids in China. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (1):48 – 61.
Lee Wilkins (2003). Militant Tolerance. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):59-72.
Peter King (1994). Against Tolerance. Philosophy Now 11:23-24.
Daniel Augenstein (2010). Tolerance and Liberal Justice. Ratio Juris 23 (4):437-459.
Oyuna Dorzhiguishaeva (2008). Tolerance as the Basic Category of Buddhist Ethics. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:13-19.
Dorzhiguishaeva Oyuna (2008). Tolerance as the Basic Category of Buddhist Ethics. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:107-113.
Wibren van der Burg (1998). Beliefs, Persons and Practices: Beyond Tolerance. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (2):227-254.
Wibren Van Der Burg (1998). Beliefs, Persons and Practices: Beyond Tolerance. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (2):227 - 254.
C. S. Momoh (ed.) (1988). Nigerian Studies in Religious Tolerance. National Association for Religious Tolerance.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads13 ( #255,413 of 1,790,293 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #429,822 of 1,790,293 )
How can I increase my downloads?