David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 81 (4):837 - 850 (2008)
Drawing on a number of recent high-profile cases of corporate corruption, we develop a process model that explains the escalation of deception in corrupt firms. If undetected, an initial lie can begin a process whereby the ease, severity and pervasiveness of deception increases overtime so that it eventually becomes an organization level phenomenon. We propose that organizational complexity has an amplifying effect. A␣feedback loop between organization level deception and each of the escalation stages positively reinforces the process. In addition, moderators are proposed that will halt escalation at various stages. By conceptualizing corporate deception as a social process, the paper contributes to a growing body of research that looks beyond 'bad' individuals for the causes of corporate illegality.
|Keywords||deception corruption escalation lying ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Guido Palazzo, Franciska Krings & Ulrich Hoffrage (2012). Ethical Blindness. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3):323-338.
Piet Eenkhoorn & Johan J. Graafland (2011). Lying in Business: Insights From Hannah Arendt's 'Lying in Politics'. Business Ethics 20 (4):359-374.
Ahmet Ekici & Sule Onsel (2013). How Ethical Behavior of Firms is Influenced by the Legal and Political Environments: A Bayesian Causal Map Analysis Based on Stages of Development. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 115 (2):271-290.
Mary Hogue, Julia Levashina & Hongli Hang (2013). Will I Fake It? The Interplay of Gender, Machiavellianism, and Self-Monitoring on Strategies for Honesty in Job Interviews. Journal of Business Ethics 117 (2):399-411.
Sergio Román (2010). Relational Consequences of Perceived Deception in Online Shopping: The Moderating Roles of Type of Product, Consumer's Attitude Toward the Internet and Consumer's Demographics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):373 - 391.
Similar books and articles
Joan S. Lockard (1997). Distal Versus Proximal Mechanisms of “Real” Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):120-121.
Dion Scott-Kakures (2002). At "Permanent Risk&Quot;: Reasoning and Self-Knowledge in Self-Deception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (3):576-603.
David W. Hollar, John Hattie, Bert Goldman & James Lancaster (2000). Developing Assessment Procedures and Assessing Two Models of Escalation Behavior Among Community College Administrators. Theory and Decision 49 (1):1-24.
Clancy W. Martin (ed.) (2009). The Philosophy of Deception. Oxford University Press.
Robert Audi (1997). Self-Deception Vs. Self-Caused Deception: A Comment on Professor Mele. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):104-104.
Robert F. Bornstein (1997). Varieties of Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):108-109.
Alfred R. Mele (1997). Understanding and Explaining Real Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):127-134.
C. Zyglidopoulos Stelios, J. Fleming Peter & Sandra Rothenberg (forthcoming). Rationalization, Overcompensation and the Escalation of Corruption in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics.
Stelios C. Zyglidopoulos, Peter J. Fleming & Sandra Rothenberg (2009). Rationalization, Overcompensation and the Escalation of Corruption in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):65 - 73.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #94,211 of 1,102,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #91,864 of 1,102,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?