Is Model T Rattle-Free?

Faith and Philosophy 32 (2):177-181 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Getting that Model T Back on the Road: Thomas Flint on Incarnation and Mereology,” William Hasker contends that the reasons I offered for being dissatisfied with Model T, a mereological model of the incarnation, are insufficient. I argue, though, that Hasker’s defense of Model T is inadequate; though Christians may not want to consign it to the junkyard, they should at least be open to trading it in for a better model.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Spinoza’s Model of Human Nature.Andrew Youpa - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):pp. 61-76.
A free-market model for media ethics: Adam Smith's looking glass.Lawrence Souder - 2010 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 25 (1):53 – 64.
Rattle-sword.James H. Foster - 1997 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 41 (1):58-63.
Equality-free saturated models.P. Dellunde - 2003 - Reports on Mathematical Logic:3-22.
ICTs, Values and Social Change: The Case of Canadian Democracy.Robert Rattle - 2012 - International Review of Information Ethics 18:12.
The free market model versus government: A reply to Nozick.John T. Sanders - 1977 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):35-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-15

Downloads
35 (#435,969)

6 months
9 (#259,174)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Flint
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Paradox of Increase.Eric T. Olson - 2006 - The Monist 89 (3):390-417.
The Paradox of Increase.Eric T. Olson - 2006 - The Monist 89 (3):390-417.

Add more references