Einstein's 1935 Derivation of E=mc2

Abstract
Einstein’s 1935 derivation of mass—energy equivalence is philosophically important because it contains both a criticism of purported demonstrations that proceed by analogy and strong motivations for the definitions of the ‘new’ dynamical quantities. In this paper, I argue that Einstein’s criticism and insights are still relevant today by showing how his derivation goes beyond Friedman’s demonstration of this result in his Foundations of Spacetime ¹heories. Along the way, I isolate three distinct physical claims associated with Einstein’s famous equation that are sometimes not clearly distinguished in philosophical discussions of spacetime theory
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S1355-2198(98)00007-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 17,840
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Francisco Flores (1998). Einstein's 1935 Derivation of E=Mc. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 29 (2):223-243.
N. David Mermin (2011). Understanding Einstein's 1905 Derivation of E=Mc2. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 42 (1):1-2.
Hans C. Ohanian (2012). A Comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 Derivation of E=Mc2”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 43 (3):215-217.
Francisco Flores (2005). Interpretations of Einstein's Equation E = Mc. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):245 – 260.
Hans C. Ohanian (2009). Did Einstein Prove E=Mc2? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (2):167-173.
Francisco Flores (2006). On the Interpretation of the Equation E = Mc2: Response to Krajewski. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):217 – 218.
Gerald Keaney (2008). In Defence of Einstein. Crossroads 3 (1):64-68 Free Online.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-13

Total downloads

16 ( #190,812 of 1,781,042 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #291,797 of 1,781,042 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.