David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (4):513-533 (2009)
The accusation that contemporary political philosophy is carried out in too ahistorical a fashion depends upon it being possible for historical facts to ground normative political principles. This they cannot do. Each of the seven ways in which it might be thought possible for them to do so fails for one or more of four reasons: History yields no timeless set of universal moral values; it displays no convergence upon such a set; it reveals no univocal moral or cultural context in the present; the failure of an ethical tradition to successfully respond to criticism over a long period of time is no guarantee of its inability to do so. Because historical critiques of contemporary normative thought rely upon one or more of these things holding true, they are, as a class of arguments, to be rejected.
|Keywords||Political Philosophy History historicism Macintyre Skinner Berlin traditionalism contextualism Larmore political theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Alasdair C. MacIntyre (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
Thomas Nagel (1986). The View From Nowhere. Oxford University Press.
Richard Rorty (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Sandel (2003). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Routledge, in Association with the Open University 336-343.
Bernard Williams (2002). Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Gabriele De Angelis (2010). On the Importance of History for Political Philosophy. A Reply to Jonathan Floyd. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (4):541-548.
Jonathan Floyd (2011). Historical Facts and Political Principles. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (1):89-90.
Similar books and articles
Isaiah Berlin (2006). Political Ideas in the Romantic Age: Their Rise and Influence on Modern Thought. Chatto & Windus.
Alan Thomas (2006). Value and Context: The Nature of Moral and Political Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Quentin Skinner (1996). Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge University Press.
John Dunn (1996). The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge University Press.
David Boucher (1989). The Social and Political Thought of R.G. Collingwood. Cambridge University Press.
Ryan K. Balot (2006). Greek Political Thought. Blackwell Pub..
Ronald Beiner (2000). Community Versus Citizenship: MacIntyre's Revolt Against the Modern State. Critical Review 14 (4):459-479.
D. Howard (2011). Why Study the History of Political Thought? Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (5):519-531.
Added to index2010-04-06
Total downloads52 ( #81,860 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #277,703 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?