Mathematical Skepticism
The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:217-265 (2000)
| Abstract | I argue that, according to Descartes, even mathematics is not immune from doubt and absolutely reliable, and hence fails to grant the ultimate justification of science. Descartes offers two arguments and a corollary to support this view. They are sufficient to show that the mathematical atheist cannot justifiably claim to have absolutely certain knowledge even of simple mathematical truths. Philosophical reflection itself turns out to be the only alternative means to provide knowledge with a stable foundation | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavide Rizza (2011). Magicicada, Mathematical Explanation and Mathematical Realism. Erkenntnis 74 (1):101-114.
M. Lange (2010). What Are Mathematical Coincidences (and Why Does It Matter)? Mind 119 (474):307-340.
Jean-Pierre Marquis (1999). Mathematical Engineering and Mathematical Change. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (3):245 – 259.
Gianluigi Oliveri (1997). Criticism and Growth of Mathematical Knowledge. Philosophia Mathematica 5 (3):228-249.
Mark McEvoy (2012). Platonism and the 'Epistemic Role Puzzle'. Philosophia Mathematica 20 (3):289-304.
Luciano Floridi (2004). Mathematical Skepticism : The Debate Between Hobbes and Wallis. In Maia Neto, José Raimundo & Richard H. Popkin (eds.), Skepticism in Renaissance and Post-Renaissance Thought: New Interpretations. Humanity Books.
Otávio Bueno (2008). Truth and Proof. Manuscrito 31 (1).
Stewart Shapiro (2004). Foundations of Mathematics: Metaphysics, Epistemology, Structure. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):16 - 37.
Michael Resnik (1995). Scientific Vs. Mathematical Realism: The Indispensability Argument. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (2):166-174.
Timothy John Nulty (2005). A Critique of Resnik's Mathematical Realism. Erkenntnis 62 (3):379 - 393.
Carlo Cellucci (2000). The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge: An Open World View. In Emily Grosholz & Herbert Breger (eds.), The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge, pp. 153-176. Kluwer.
Mary Leng, Alexander Paseau & Michael D. Potter (eds.) (2007). Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads4 ( #178,675 of 549,080 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,080 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
