Turing’s Imitation Game: Still an Impossible Challenge for All Machines and Some Judges
Minds and Machines 19 (1):145-150 (2008)
| Abstract | An Evaluation of the 2008 Loebner Contest. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Artificial Intelligence Turing test Loebner contest | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSaul Traiger (2000). Making the Right Identification in the Turing Test. Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.
Larry Hauser (2001). Look Who's Moving the Goal Posts Now. Minds and Machines 11 (1):41-51.
Huma Shah & Kevin Warwick (2010). Hidden Interlocutor Misidentification in Practical Turing Tests. Minds and Machines, Vol. 20. No. 3 20 (3):441-454.
Dale Jacquette (1993). Who's Afraid of the Turing Test? Behavior and Philosophy 20 (21):63-74.
Jamie Cullen (2009). Imitation Versus Communication: Testing for Human-Like Intelligence. Minds and Machines 19 (2):237-254.
Sean Zdenek (2001). Passing Loebner's Turing Test: A Case of Conflicting Discourse Functions. Minds and Machines 11 (1):53-76.
Huma Shah & Kevin Warwick (2010). Testing Turing's Parallel-Paired Imitation Game. Kybernetes 39 (3).
Y. Sato & T. Ikegami (2004). Undecidability in the Imitation Game. Minds and Machines 14 (2):133-43.
James H. Moor (2001). The Status and Future of the Turing Test. Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-02-14Total downloads9 ( #113,901 of 548,969 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
